Subversion does support it, but it kinda brings it's own "uniqueness" to the situation. <br>
<br>
(warning, comments are based on some very limited experience with it) <br>
With subversion you no longer have independant file versions, but a
single "repository version". So while you can move files and
rename them, you no longer have individual file histories or
versions. Also, things like "tagging" and "branching" don't
really exist in subversion, but are basically replaced by copying all
the files in the repository into a (possibly read-only, in the case of
a TAG) sub-directory. You get the same functionality, in a
slightly different manner.<br>
<br>
A neat writeup can be found at <a href="http://www.pushok.com/soft_svn_vscvs_1.php">http://www.pushok.com/soft_svn_vscvs_1.php</a><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On Apr 7, 2005 9:32 AM, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mathieu Malaterre</b> <<a href="mailto:mathieu.malaterre@kitware.com">mathieu.malaterre@kitware.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Just a side note. There is a way to do it properly. But you need to have<br> access to the cvs server. If so you can copy the comma v file from one<br>place to another (after creating properly the directoy) and then cvs<br>remove the old one. This is also not recommended because CVS does not<br>mark this as an event...<br><br>Hopefully svn will support this.<br><br>Mathieu<br><br><br>Randall Hand wrote:<br>> No, that's a CVS glitch. Unfortunately, CVS has no inherant support for<br>> "moving" files. The only way to do it is to delete the file & re-add it<br>> as a new file, and in doing so you lose all the history & it's reset to<br>> version 1.1(.1.1 or whatever, depending on the branch).<br>><br>> so if you look at the contents of the two files (the new 1.1 and the old<br>> 1.24), you'll see that they're the same. It's merely that CVS has<br>> started it's version numbers over again, because of the new directory.<br>><br>> On Apr 6, 2005 10:05 PM, *Juan José Aja Fernández* <<a href="mailto:juan.aja@gmail.com">juan.aja@gmail.com</a><br>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:juan.aja@gmail.com">juan.aja@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>><br>> I too updated to the latest cvs version and noticed some strange<br>> changes.<br>> I was working with the cvs version of about a month ago, when I<br>> updated to the latest I found that<br>> vtkUnstructuredGridVolumeRayCastMapper was moved to a new folder:<br>> vtkVolumeRendering, ok no problem I just changed my CMakeLists to work<br>> with the new structure. When I recompiled my program stopped working<br>> saying that the method New in vtkUnstructuredGridVolumeRayCastMapper<br>> was protected, that seemed weird so I checked the source and found<br>> that the revision number was 1.1, but in my previous version (the one<br>> from a month ago) the exact same file says revision 1.24.<br>><br>> How come? Did you guys decided to roll back?<br>><br>> Thanks in advance<br>><br>> On Apr 5, 2005 12:01 PM, Mathieu Malaterre<br>> <<a href="mailto:mathieu.malaterre@kitware.com">mathieu.malaterre@kitware.com</a><br>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mathieu.malaterre@kitware.com">mathieu.malaterre@kitware.com</a>>> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > > Well, when I said Makefile what I really meant was<br>> CMakeLists.txt . I<br>> > > had to add those libraries to the "TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES" line.<br>> ><br>> > Sorry I did not realize. This is a tricky case since<br>> vtkVolumeRendering<br>> > is at the end: it only depends on other libraries but no existing<br>> > library depend on it (obviously!). Hopefully this is extremely<br>> rare, and<br>> > in fact this is the first time since VTK 4.0 that a new library<br>> is added<br>> > like that (only VTK/Widgets was added recently but nothing was<br>> moved to<br>> > this library from existing VTK lib).<br>> ><br>> > > Ok.. I wasn't sure you allowed just anyone to edit pages. I<br>> figured it<br>> > > was restricted to Kitware Employees & special VTK contributors.<br>> ><br>> > Nope, it is only restricted to non-spammers :)<br>> ><br>> > Mathieu<br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > This is the private VTK discussion list.<br>> > Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at:<br>> <a href="http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ">http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ</a><br>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>> > <a href="http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers">http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers</a><br>> ><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> This is the private VTK discussion list.<br>> Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at:<br>> <a href="http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ">http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ</a><br>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>> <a href="http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers">http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers</a><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> --<br>> Randall Hand<br>> <a href="http://www.yeraze.com">http://www.yeraze.com</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br><br><br>-- <br>Randall Hand<br><a href="http://www.yeraze.com">http://www.yeraze.com</a>