Mike,<br><br>Looks to me that over 40 classes were removed. Some of these may have been moved, my script does not take that into account.<br><a href="http://www.itk.org/Wiki/New52Classes#Removed_Classes_in_this_Release">http://www.itk.org/Wiki/New52Classes#Removed_Classes_in_this_Release</a><br>
<br>Bill<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 29, 2008 2:31 PM, Mike Jackson <<a href="mailto:imikejackson@gmail.com">imikejackson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Probably depends on how much API breakage there is. Usually patch<br>releases should not break APIs, or at least this should be kept to a<br>minimum. Just something to think about.<br><br>Mike<br><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
<br>On Jan 29, 2008 2:26 PM, David Cole <<a href="mailto:david.cole@kitware.com">david.cole@kitware.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Bill,<br>><br>> This revision of VTK/CMakeLists.txt was the first commit to the VTK-5-0<br>
> branch:<br>> revision 1.341.2.1<br>> date: 2005-09-01 16:49:44 +0000; author: david.cole; state: Exp; lines:<br>> +2 -2<br>> ENH: Update version numbers in the VTK-5-0 branch to 5.0.<br>><br>> Sept. 1, 2005 was the first VTK-5-0 commit activity after the branch<br>
> creation.<br>><br>> For the purpose of running your script on VTK, I would say changes since<br>> then in CVS HEAD are "new in VTK 5.2" -- feel free to run your script and<br>> post the results to the Wiki -- I would *love* that! Don't be surprised if<br>
> it takes a while...<br>><br>> As to why we aren't calling it VTK 6.0, I haven't really personally given it<br>> much thought. The automatic rollover to the next even minor number seems<br>> good to me. Proclaiming it "6.0" sounds like a reasonable idea, although for<br>
> people buying the books, it might be more "warm/fuzzy" to have a VTK 5 book<br>> and a 5.2 software install vs. a 5 book and a 6 software install...<br>><br>> Anybody else have a strong opinion either way on the 5.2/6.0 thought?<br>
><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> On 1/29/08, Bill Lorensen <<a href="mailto:bill.lorensen@gmail.com">bill.lorensen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > David,<br>> ><br>> > I have a script that we run on itk to generate a wiki-compatible list of<br>
> new classes, tests etc.I also have a script that generates a wiki-compatible<br>> list of changes. Both take a start and end date as an argument. They are<br>> unix shell scripts with two small gawk programs,<br>
> ><br>> > The itk list looks like this: <a href="http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_3.4" target="_blank">http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_3.4</a><br>> ><br>> > If you want, I can add links to the vtk equivalents on the VTK release<br>
> page on the vtk wiki.<br>> ><br>> > What date do you consider VTK5.2 started? Looking at the repository I<br>> think September 8, 2005 may be the date just after VTK5.0.<br>> ><br>> > One last comment. Is there a reason that this release is not called 6.0?<br>
> It seems that with over 300 new classes and 40 removed classes that this<br>> release is more than an upgrade from VTK5.0.<br>> ><br>> > Bill<br>> ><br>><br></div></div><div class="Ih2E3d">_______________________________________________<br>
This is the private VTK discussion list.<br></div>Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at: <a href="http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ" target="_blank">http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ</a><br><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br><a href="http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers" target="_blank">http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers</a><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>