<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div><span>Billy, I had a similar idea not too long ago, with the emphasis of using VTK to create surface meshes for subsequent use in one of my solvers. The idea was to utilize various implicit functions along with boolean operations to create the polygonal surface and then export the mesh in some standard CAE format. I have done only a simple proof-of-concept test of this (using the ice cream example from the book). Please keep me posted if you do end up developing this capability. I believe that the necessary math is in VTK, the difficult part is building the actual GUI.</span></div><div><br><span></span></div><div><span>Thanks,</span></div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Lubos Brieda</div><div>www.particleincell.com<br></div><div><br></div> <div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"> <div
style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> David E DeMarle <dave.demarle@kitware.com><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Billy Araujo <billyaraujo@gmail.com> <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> vtkusers@vtk.org <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Monday, April 16, 2012 2:22 PM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [vtkusers] Use VTK as geometry kernel<br> </font> </div> <br>
I can't answer that definitively, as I don't know the scope of what<br>your code needs to do.<br><br>I can say that in VTK 6 there will be much less library overhead than<br>there is now. VTK 6's modular structure makes it so that if you only<br>want to use vtk's data structures you can configure and build a<br>version of VTK that includes little more than the data structures<br>themselves.<br><br>David E DeMarle<br>Kitware, Inc.<br>R&D Engineer<br>21 Corporate Drive<br>Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662<br>Phone: 518-881-4909<br><br><br><br>On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Billy Araujo <<a ymailto="mailto:billyaraujo@gmail.com" href="mailto:billyaraujo@gmail.com">billyaraujo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Hi,<br>><br>> I feel VTK is geared toward visualization but it seems to do much more.<br>> I would like to use VTK as my base mesh/geometry library for a FVM<br>> code. Is this viable or will it have too much overhead?<br>><br>>
Regards,<br>><br>> Billy.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Powered by <a target="_blank" href="http://www.kitware.com">www.kitware.com</a><br>><br>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html<br>><br>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ<br>><br>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers<br>_______________________________________________<br>Powered by www.kitware.com<br><br>Visit other Kitware open-source projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br><br>Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: <a href="http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ" target="_blank">http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ</a><br><br>Follow this link to
subscribe/unsubscribe:<br><a href="http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers" target="_blank">http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers</a><br><br><br> </div> </div> </div></body></html>