|
Notes |
|
|
(0027170)
|
|
Brad King
|
|
2011-07-29 17:06
|
|
|
The implementation depends on it being there, and it is helpful for "pvvtk print" to be able to show what is in upstream VTK master. However, we can probably rename it to "upstream-vtk-master" or something unambiguous. Any ideas for a better name? |
|
|
|
(0027175)
|
|
Utkarsh Ayachit
|
|
2011-07-30 10:12
|
|
|
"upstream-vtk-master" works too. I believe the confusion happens because when one says "pv-master" it's easy to read that as pvvtk/master, but that won't happen with pvvtk/upstream-vtk-master. |
|
|
|
(0027184)
|
|
Andy Bauer
|
|
2011-08-01 14:36
|
|
|
Add another person to get confused by pvvtk/master and pvvtk/pv-master. I vote for a name change too. |
|
|
|
(0036625)
|
|
Cory Quammen
|
|
2016-07-27 11:00
|
|
|
Irrelevant now that we are using gitlab. |
|
|
|
(0038022)
|
|
Kitware Robot
|
|
2016-08-12 09:58
|
|
Resolving issue as `moved`.
This issue tracker is no longer used. Further discussion of this issue may take place in the current ParaView Issues page linked in the banner at the top of this page. |
|