MantisBT - ParaView
View Issue Details
0012859ParaView(No Category)public2012-01-13 14:572014-02-04 21:30
Nathan Fabian 
Utkarsh Ayachit 
normalminorhave not tried
closedno change required 
3.12 
4.2 
Sandia
performance
0012859: progress events at high scale
Although there is a #define in vtkProgressHandler.cxx which allows one to disable progress events entirely. It would be nice if they were disabled automatically on anything larger than 256 processes.

Running in situ I see a small spike starting at 512 processes which grows roughly linear with core count above that.
No tags attached.
Issue History
2012-01-13 14:57Nathan FabianNew Issue
2012-01-24 11:58Robert MaynardTopic Name => 12859-VisItBrige-external-tiff-support
2012-01-24 11:58Robert MaynardStatusbacklog => gatekeeper review
2012-01-24 11:58Robert MaynardResolutionopen => fixed
2012-01-24 11:58Robert MaynardAssigned To => Robert Maynard
2012-01-25 11:57Robert MaynardAssigned ToRobert Maynard =>
2012-01-25 11:57Robert MaynardNote Added: 0027978
2012-01-25 11:57Robert MaynardStatusgatekeeper review => backlog
2012-01-25 11:57Robert MaynardResolutionfixed => reopened
2014-01-21 11:56Utkarsh AyachitTopic Name12859-VisItBrige-external-tiff-support =>
2014-01-21 11:56Utkarsh AyachitNote Added: 0032198
2014-01-21 11:56Utkarsh AyachitStatusbacklog => gatekeeper review
2014-01-21 11:56Utkarsh AyachitFixed in Version => 4.2
2014-01-21 11:56Utkarsh AyachitResolutionreopened => no change required
2014-01-21 11:56Utkarsh AyachitAssigned To => Utkarsh Ayachit
2014-01-21 11:57Utkarsh AyachitNote Edited: 0032198bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=32198#r723
2014-01-21 11:57Utkarsh AyachitStatusgatekeeper review => customer review
2014-02-04 21:30Alan ScottNote Added: 0032271
2014-02-04 21:30Alan ScottStatuscustomer review => closed

Notes
(0027978)
Robert Maynard   
2012-01-25 11:57   
I updated the incorrect bug. I have done no work on this bug.
(0032198)
Utkarsh Ayachit   
2014-01-21 11:56   
(edited on: 2014-01-21 11:57)
We no longer collect progress events from satellites when running in parallel (refer to BUG 0013839). As a result this is not longer relevant.

(0032271)
Alan Scott   
2014-02-04 21:30   
Trusting Utkarsh (and I remember seeing this when he implemented it).