|
Notes |
|
|
(0011247)
|
|
Berk Geveci
|
|
2008-04-09 21:12
|
|
|
Maybe we could add a button to the information tab to get the range for all time steps? |
|
|
|
(0017198)
|
|
Alan Scott
|
|
2009-08-24 16:57
|
|
For 3.6.2, lets limit this bug to just reading in the last timestep. It would be really nice to add an option to the settings dialog that allows the user to choose either the first or last timestep. Default to the last time step (matching EnSight).
What should we do for 3.8.0 - write up another bug that is more thorough? |
|
|
|
(0017341)
|
|
Alan Scott
|
|
2009-09-08 14:43
|
|
|
As per Utkarsh's suggestion, I am moving this back to 3.8. It really should be fixed correctly (whatever we decide that means) for 3.8. |
|
|
|
(0018476)
|
|
Alan Scott
|
|
2009-11-18 14:56
|
|
For 3.8, I would like to propose the following:
* User selectable options. Nicer again would be a threshold that we could set in the settings panel - above some size one functionality, below some size, and different functionality.
- ParaView goes to last time step, sets min/max range from last time step. (Default, or for small data)
- ParaView stays with first time step. (for large data)
- ParaView updates every time step. (Only if user selects this option.) |
|
|
|
(0019946)
|
|
Alan Scott
|
|
2010-03-17 16:38
|
|
|
Duplicate. Actually fixed with bug number 10062. |
|