Agenda&Status 051807: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* Some things remain to be done, but will need to be included in next year maintenance | * Some things remain to be done, but will need to be included in next year maintenance | ||
* Should we include it in Release 3.4 ? maybe not... | * Should we include it in Release 3.4 ? maybe not... | ||
==== Quad Edge Mesh Work ==== | |||
* Proposal page: [[Proposals:New Mesh Class|New Mesh Class]] | |||
==== MINC File Format ==== | |||
* Existing paper in the Insight Journal | |||
* Proposal page: [[Proposals:Adding MINC File Format|Adding MINC File Format]] | |||
==== MetaDataDictionary ==== | |||
* Should the MetaDataDictionary be passed through the pipeline? | |||
* Should only parts be passed? | |||
** By naming convention? | |||
** By programmer designation? | |||
Latest revision as of 14:08, 23 August 2010
Agenda
Project Management
- Schedule
- Next release 3.4 http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_Schedule#Release_3.4_Schedule
- Anticipate Delay on the Release Schedule
- Insight Journal list of pending papers:
http://www.insight-journal.org/InsightJournalManager/admin_publications_toolkits.php?back=index.php
Technical Topics
Statistics classes refactoring
- Refactoring Statistics Framework 2007
- We are wrapping up this activity
- Some things remain to be done, but will need to be included in next year maintenance
- Should we include it in Release 3.4 ? maybe not...
Quad Edge Mesh Work
- Proposal page: New Mesh Class
MINC File Format
- Existing paper in the Insight Journal
- Proposal page: Adding MINC File Format
MetaDataDictionary
- Should the MetaDataDictionary be passed through the pipeline?
- Should only parts be passed?
- By naming convention?
- By programmer designation?
