SimpleITK/Tcon 2011 6 13: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| Win XP/7 || 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) || 1.6 or later (optional) || 8.5 or later (optional) || 5.1 (optional) || 3.x || 2.10 (optional) | | Win XP/7 || 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) || 1.6 or later (optional) || 8.5 or later (optional) || 5.1 (optional) || 3.x || 2.10 (optional) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Linux || 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) || 1.6 or later (optional) || 8.5 or later (optional) || 5.1 (optional) || | | Linux || 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) || 1.6 or later (optional) || 8.5 or later (optional) || 5.1 (optional) || Not supported (mono?) || 2.10 (optional) | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 14:24, 13 June 2011
Tcon Information
Phone Line:
Please join the following teleconference line: Toll-Free #: 1-800-704-9804 International #: 1-404-920-6604 Participant Code: 61466276
Wednesday, June 13th, 10:30am Eastern Time
https://cc.readytalk.com/r/trndrwthtkkn
Attendees
- David Cole
- Dan Blezek
- Brad Lowekamp
- Luis Ibanez
IMPORTANT-new repository- IMPORTANT
- Repository has moved DO NOT USE GITHUB any more
- New Repository
Objective
- Packaging and Distribution
- Each Language should have separate download
- What are the systems and versions of languages distributed?
- URL location for distribution?
- Installation
- C++
- Supported Languages
- Python is currently best supported
- C#, and R are currently "2nd Tier"
OS | Python | Java | Tcl? | Lua? | C#? | R? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MacOSX (10.6) | 2.6 | 1.6 | 8.5 | 5.1 (optional) | Not supported (mono?) | 2.10 (optional) |
Win XP/7 | 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) | 1.6 or later (optional) | 8.5 or later (optional) | 5.1 (optional) | 3.x | 2.10 (optional) |
Linux | 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) | 1.6 or later (optional) | 8.5 or later (optional) | 5.1 (optional) | Not supported (mono?) | 2.10 (optional) |
Action Items
Blocking Task
- Need to separate ITK library for SImpleITK
- No ITK includes in SimpleITK
- DJB: is this really a necessity? The only user this will be a problem for is the C++ user, and I would suspect that they don't mind all that much, especially if it is minimized. I'd hate to see us waste a lot of effort for very little return.
- Organization of SimpleITK
- Clearly separate distributed header, from compiled code
- Separate SimpleITK interface form C++ template wacky-ness include
- Need versioning info for SImpleITK
- Would be good to include git TAG, if no tag the SHA in version