[vtk-developers] vtkArrayExtents (and others) Python wrapping

[Eric E. Monson]

Hey David,

So far everything is working great -- wonderful job, again!!

Thanks,
-Eric


On Sep 14, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Eric E. Monson wrote:

> Thanks, David,
> 
> I'll take a look at it in the next day or two and let you know if I have any problems. I appreciate you addressing this so quickly.
> 
> Talk to you later,
> -Eric
> 
> 
> On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:27 AM, David Gobbi wrote:
> 
>> Hi Eric,
>> 
>> This morning I added some code that allows the python wrappers to
>> resolve typedefs, so those missing vtkArray methods are wrapped again.
>> Let me know if the new code works for you.
>> 
>> David
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Eric E. Monson <emonson at cs.duke.edu> wrote:
>>> On Sep 7, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Timothy Shead wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 9/7/10 1:38 PM, David Gobbi wrote:
>>>>> I'm fine with that.  Wrapper typedef support is something that I had
>>>>> planned from the start, I just didn't expect that it would be needed
>>>>> so soon.  What do you think of Eric's GetDimensionRange() method
>>>>> suggestion?  I'd prefer that there are always named-method
>>>>> alternatives to [ ] operator methods.
>>>> 
>>>> Makes sense, although I would strongly prefer vtkArrayExtents::GetExtent(...), for consistency with vtkArray::GetExtent(...), which returns the same value.
>>> 
>>> Ah, thank you -- I hadn't seen the vtkArray::GetExtent() option. I can get the values from that for now.
>>> 
>>> -Eric
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers