[vtk-developers] Fwd: [Paraview-developers] Moving vtkMemberFunctionCommand to VTK

[David Doria]

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:57 AM, David Doria <daviddoria at gmail.com> wrote:
> A few days ago Pat Marion pointed out on the VTK devel list that
> ParaView/Servers/Filters/vtkMemberFunctionCommand.h is a great way to
> catch events with class member functions. I tried it out and it is
> indeed fantastic! It lets me handle events in a much more structured
> way.
>
> We would like to propose moving this file into VTK so that it can be
> used by VTK-only applications (without copying the file into each one,
> as I have been doing :) ). Are there any objections to doing this?
> Maybe this should actually be done by one of the Paraview devels so
> that the appropriate changes can be made to Paraview so that it can
> still see the file properly. Any volunteers?
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David

>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com>

Date: Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:19 AM

Subject: Re: [Paraview-developers] Moving vtkMemberFunctionCommand to VTK

To: David Doria <daviddoria at gmail.com>

Cc: paraview-developers at paraview.org


>
> That sounds like a good idea. However, you may want to raise the

question on  the vtk-developers list to chalk out a cleaner API. This

would the only code in VTK that requires passing (*this) as an

argument which may be a bit non-conventional for VTK.


> Utkarsh



Please see the proposal and discussion above. Utkarsh sounds like he's on
board with change, but would like to make sure no one has a problem with
some specifics of the implementation. Would everyone take a look? If we
don't hear anything by midweek, we'll assume the interface is acceptable and
proceed with the move.

Thanks,

David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20100924/eb6fb37e/attachment.html>