[vtk-developers] Module interface files

[David Cole]

Just out of curiosity, what's your use case? Why do you need to know
about the existence of non-wrapped classes externally?

I kind of like the fact that classes that are not wrapped are not even
mentioned.


On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:30 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why can't paraview be made to check the WRAP_EXCLUDE
> property for each file?  Adding another list seems messy.
>
>  - David
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>> Oh! Yea, I'd think that can be fixed. We cannot simply extend the same
>> list though (since ParaView depends on that now), but I vote for
>> adding another variable.
>>
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Utkarsh,
>>>
>>> That is the file that I was referring to.  It only lists classes
>>> that are not WRAP_EXCLUDE.  In contrast, the VTK 5.10
>>> Kit.cmake files listed all the classes, not just wrapped ones.
>>>
>>>  - David
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
>>> <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>> There is a separate Module-Classes.cmake file that's written out that
>>>> has all the classes.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The module API files installed in lib/cmake/vtk-6.0/Modules
>>>>> only list classes that aren't marked WRAP_EXCLUDE.  This
>>>>> is different from the behavior of VTK 5, which listed all classes.
>>>>> Is there a reason for this change?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd prefer if all the classes were listed, with wrap-excluded files
>>>>> marked as WRAP_EXCLUDE in the file.
>>>>>
>>>>>  - David
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>