[vtk-developers] Status of AddActor(), AddActor2D(), AddVolume() vs AddViewProp()
Bill Lorensen
bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Fri Aug 30 14:55:49 EDT 2013
Actually, we have to keep vtkProp because of classes like
vtkPropPicker, vtkPropCollection, ...
Damn Microsoft.
I don't like ViewProp, never did. I guess we are stuck with it.
I hate to see AddActor go. It is a part of VTK's DNA.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:41:18 -0400, Bill Lorensen said:
>
>>If we deprecate AddActor, ... then we should also rename vtkProp to
>>vtkViewProp and deprecate vtkProp.
>
> I'm not opposed to vtkProp being renamed to vtkViewProp, but that obviously has bigger implications than AddActor->AddViewProp. For example, since the AddActor->AddViewProp change was done from VTK 4 to 5, such a refactoring would still allow the wiki examples to be VTK 5 & 6 compatible, whereas vtkProp->vtkViewProp would not, and would mean updating docs, the wiki, migration guide, etc.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________________
> Sean McBride, B. Eng sean at rogue-research.com
> Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
> Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
>
>
--
Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
More information about the vtk-developers
mailing list