[vtk-developers] Possible vtkScalarBarActor improvement

Mon Oct 28 15:00:25 EDT 2013

Thanks Jc for the info. I will resubmit the request tomorrow. Will also look into the VTK contribution route.

Kevin

From: Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin [mailto:jchris.fillionr at kitware.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 2:26 PM
To: Wang, Kevin
Cc: David Thompson; vtk-developers at vtk.org
Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Possible vtkScalarBarActor improvement

Hi Kevin,

Could you close and resubmit your request against the `slicer-v5.10.1` branch ?
In the mean time, the VTK contribution workflow has been updated to accept contribution for VTK 5.10.x. Would be great if you could also submit a topic on VTK proper.

See here for more details: http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/Gerrit-release-5-10-branch-now-open-for-backported-fixes-td5724188.html
Thanks
Jc

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Wang, Kevin <kevin.wang at rmp.uhn.on.ca<mailto:kevin.wang at rmp.uhn.on.ca>> wrote:
Thanks Jc. I have created a pull request at https://github.com/Slicer/VTK/pull/1

Please review and let me know.

Kevin

From: Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin [mailto:jchris.fillionr at kitware.com<mailto:jchris.fillionr at kitware.com>]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 11:57 AM

To: Wang, Kevin
Cc: David Thompson; vtk-developers at vtk.org<mailto:vtk-developers at vtk.org>
Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Possible vtkScalarBarActor improvement

Hi Kevin,

Could you submit a pull request on the SlicerVTK fork ? It will make the review process easier. Make sure to base your topic of commit 0e0674a3695f.

Thanks
Jc

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Wang, Kevin <kevin.wang at rmp.uhn.on.ca<mailto:kevin.wang at rmp.uhn.on.ca>> wrote:
Thanks Jc for the info.

Attached are the patches for vtk. I just used vtkScalarsToColors.h and vtkScalarsToColors.h from vtk 6.0 without any changes and it is compiling and working fine. For vtkScalarBarActor class, I just added a small section to check if there is annotations set for the lookupTable then use the annotations as the label.

David, can you please take a look to see if it needs improvement. If everything is fine, I will submit a pull request within SlicerVTK fork.

Thanks again,

Kevin

From: Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin [mailto:jchris.fillionr at kitware.com<mailto:jchris.fillionr at kitware.com>]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 12:25 PM

To: Wang, Kevin
Cc: David Thompson; vtk-developers at vtk.org<mailto:vtk-developers at vtk.org>
Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Possible vtkScalarBarActor improvement

Hi Kevin,
Great :)

The patch should be both sent:
    - to VTK dev list for integration to 5.10 release branch  (gerrit is not yet ready to work with 5.10 release branch [1])
    - as pull request based on commit 0e0674a3 [2] associated with branch "slicer-v5.10.1" [3] within SlicerVTK fork.
Let me know if you have any questions,
Jc

[1] http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/5-10-1-question-td5723589.html#a5723591

[2] https://github.com/Slicer/VTK/commit/0e0674a3695fdeaf01ce87dfc04e32111b7402e0

[3] https://github.com/Slicer/VTK/tree/slicer-v5.10.1

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Wang, Kevin <kevin.wang at rmp.uhn.on.ca<mailto:kevin.wang at rmp.uhn.on.ca>> wrote:
Hi Jc,

I am almost done with the backporting and other changes to VTK5.10 and slicer. You mentioned that the changes in vtk can be integrated into the SlicerVTK clone [1]. however, I am not clear on how to proceed. Do I follow the common practice to fork the slicerVTK repository and create a pull request or something else?

Thanks,

Kevin

[1] https://github.com/Slicer/VTK

From: Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin [mailto:jchris.fillionr at kitware.com<mailto:jchris.fillionr at kitware.com>]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 11:19 AM
To: Wang, Kevin
Cc: David Thompson; vtk-developers at vtk.org<mailto:vtk-developers at vtk.org>

Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Possible vtkScalarBarActor improvement

Make sense. Let us know when you have your topic updated.
Thanks for your hard work :)
Jc

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Wang, Kevin <kevin.wang at rmp.uhn.on.ca<mailto:kevin.wang at rmp.uhn.on.ca>> wrote:
Hi Jc and David,

I think one reasonable solution would be to backport vtkScalarsToColors, but not backport vtkScalarBarActor. Instead we modify vtkScalarBarActor slightly to handle the new annotation functionality in vtkScalarsToColors. Then in slicer, we keep several sets of vtkStringArrays around and switch them in vtkScalarsToColors when needed. This way when we transition to vtk6.0, there will be minimal changes.

Thanks,

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: David Thompson [mailto:david.thompson at kitware.com<mailto:david.thompson at kitware.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 11:16 AM
To: Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
Cc: Wang, Kevin; vtk-developers at vtk.org<mailto:vtk-developers at vtk.org>
Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Possible vtkScalarBarActor improvement
Hi JC,

> ...
> @David: Do you see anything in the API proposed by Kevin that could be changed to be closer to what is possible in VTK 6 ? https://github.com/kevinwangcanada/Slicer/commit/551c8b7f435b518664eef2917818addf78c853e6

I would not backport vtkScalarBarActor, but you could backport vtkScalarsToColors pretty easily and use it to store color names... that's where they are stored in VTK6.

        David
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization.

--
+1 919 869 8849<tel:%2B1%20919%20869%208849>

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization.

--
+1 919 869 8849<tel:%2B1%20919%20869%208849>

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization.

--
+1 919 869 8849<tel:%2B1%20919%20869%208849>

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization.

--
+1 919 869 8849

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. 
Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. 
Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20131028/3218fc81/attachment.html>