(0029089)
Eelco van Vliet (reporter)
2012-08-30 03:37

I am running into the same problem. Is there a solution for this yet (exept for choosing a white background, then you do not see the boxes anymore) ?

Eelco

(0029340)
Sebastien Jourdain (manager)
2012-10-09 09:25

Andy, did you already solved that issue ?

(0029364)
Andy Bauer (developer)
2012-10-11 14:01

I didn't do anything to solve this problem. I'm not sure who assigned it to me either so if you want to take over on this Seb, please go ahead.

(0029499)
Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator)
2012-10-24 11:06

The white border no longer shows up when a state file is loaded from the UI or Python. Please reopen if the problem persists with the development version of ParaView (and include a state file, if possible).

(0029751)
Eelco van Vliet (reporter)
2012-11-20 08:30

Just tried it with pvbatch from version 3.98, but the problem still persists. Are you sure it was fixed ?

(0029752)
Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator)
2012-11-20 09:53

Please attach a state file to help reproduce.

(0029781)
Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator)
2012-11-23 09:51

reopening since reported reproducible by user. Awaiting state from user.

(0030427)
Eelco van Vliet (reporter)
2013-03-14 06:32

I have already uploaded the statefile + image to a new issue 0013668, but I understand you have linked that issue to this one, so I will do it again.

Here I have uploaded a new example of the white boxes occuring around text labels and legends in the latest paraview version 3.98 if you make the image with pvbatch. See the image cavity_Ustreamlines_t000005.png

I have also uploaded an OpenFOAM icoFoam case (most simple tutorial) which you can run with Allrun (if you have openfoam installed). This tarball also contains the statefile I used to make the image: Ustreamlines.pvsm

I must say: I have a special way of passing the statefiles to pvbatch: I use a script I wrote myself called pvbatchprocess.pl and pvbatchprocess.py.
The pvbatchprocess.pl reads an external file pvcases.dat (also included) in which you can define cases and states. Then per case and state a call to pvbatchprocess.py is made. In this python script I read the original paraview statefile (in this case Ustreamlines.pvsm) and add labels as defined in the pvcases.dat file. This allows you to batchprocess a whole bunch of cases. The script also replaces the original case file name for a new case file name such that you can use one statefile for multiple cases which are similar. Finally, this script also allows you to loop over a time range of VTK file stored in a directory such as produced by the sampling routines of OpenFOAM.

After processing by pvbatchprocess.py, a new statefile is make which I have also included here: pvtemp_t1363255815.824347.pvsm. This new pvtemp state is finally passed to pvbatch. In order to check the bug, you should therefore use this final pvtemp statefile.

Sorry for this long explanation which complicate things a bit, but those script make my paraview/openfoam live a lot easier when you want to batch process a lot of similar cases.

Hopefully you can fix the bug which produces those white boxes!

Regards
Eelco

(0033147)
Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator)
2014-07-30 13:16

No longer reproducible in git/master. I am quite sure this was fixed a while ago.

(0033166)
Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator)
2014-07-31 09:00

SUMMARY
---------------------------------------------
Topics merged into master:
(VTK) 14599_fix_double_range_issues
        14789_fix_border
        14831_log_scaling_crash
        14848_fix_mutlselection
        appdata-file
        catalyst-dependencies
        catalyst-kits
        compilation_issue_processxml
        excess-moc-wrapping
        fix-cache-doc
        fix-catalyst-python
        kit-libraries
(VTK) newest-xdmf
        pass_connectid_to_autompi
        remove-mpi4py
(VTK) update-vtk-20140729

---------------------------------------------
Topics reverted from next:
  14813_fix_mode_shapes_range
  fix_proxy_widget_dialog_apply
  pvweb-fixes

(0033264)
Alan Scott (manager)
2014-08-19 21:53

I believe this is the same as 13668, which was tested and closed. If this is in error, please reopen or send us a new bug report.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2011-09-07 22:32	Raymond Cohen	New Issue
2011-09-07 22:32	Raymond Cohen	File Added: highlight_box.png
2012-08-30 03:37	Eelco van Vliet	Note Added: 0029089
2012-10-09 09:25	Sebastien Jourdain	Assigned To	=> Andy Bauer
2012-10-09 09:25	Sebastien Jourdain	Note Added: 0029340
2012-10-11 14:01	Andy Bauer	Note Added: 0029364
2012-10-11 14:02	Sebastien Jourdain	Assigned To	Andy Bauer => Utkarsh Ayachit
2012-10-18 14:05	Utkarsh Ayachit	Target Version	=> 4.0
2012-10-24 11:06	Utkarsh Ayachit	Note Added: 0029499
2012-10-24 11:06	Utkarsh Ayachit	Status	backlog => gatekeeper review
2012-10-24 11:06	Utkarsh Ayachit	Fixed in Version	=> git-master
2012-10-24 11:06	Utkarsh Ayachit	Resolution	open => unable to reproduce
2012-10-24 11:06	Utkarsh Ayachit	Status	gatekeeper review => customer review
2012-10-29 17:04	Utkarsh Ayachit	Fixed in Version	git-master => 3.98.0
2012-11-20 08:30	Eelco van Vliet	Note Added: 0029751
2012-11-20 08:30	Eelco van Vliet	Status	customer review => closed
2012-11-20 09:53	Utkarsh Ayachit	Note Added: 0029752
2012-11-23 09:51	Utkarsh Ayachit	Note Added: 0029781
2012-11-23 09:51	Utkarsh Ayachit	Status	closed => backlog
2012-11-23 09:51	Utkarsh Ayachit	Resolution	unable to reproduce => reopened
2012-12-19 07:55	Utkarsh Ayachit	Relationship added	related to 0013668
2013-03-14 06:19	Eelco van Vliet	File Added: cavity.tgz
2013-03-14 06:20	Eelco van Vliet	File Added: cavity_Ustreamlines_t000005.png
2013-03-14 06:32	Eelco van Vliet	Note Added: 0030427
2013-03-14 10:20	Utkarsh Ayachit	Project	TBD => Catalyst
2013-03-14 10:20	Utkarsh Ayachit	Status	backlog => todo
2014-07-30 13:16	Utkarsh Ayachit	Note Added: 0033147
2014-07-30 13:16	Utkarsh Ayachit	Status	todo => gatekeeper review
2014-07-30 13:16	Utkarsh Ayachit	Fixed in Version	3.98.0 => git-master
2014-07-30 13:16	Utkarsh Ayachit	Resolution	reopened => fixed
2014-07-31 09:00	Utkarsh Ayachit	Status	gatekeeper review => customer review
2014-07-31 09:00	Utkarsh Ayachit	Note Added: 0033166
2014-08-19 21:53	Alan Scott	Note Added: 0033264
2014-08-19 21:53	Alan Scott	Status	customer review => closed
2014-08-29 10:59	Utkarsh Ayachit	Fixed in Version	git-master => 4.2

Notes
(0029089) Eelco van Vliet (reporter) 2012-08-30 03:37	I am running into the same problem. Is there a solution for this yet (exept for choosing a white background, then you do not see the boxes anymore) ? Eelco

(0029340) Sebastien Jourdain (manager) 2012-10-09 09:25	Andy, did you already solved that issue ?

(0029364) Andy Bauer (developer) 2012-10-11 14:01	I didn't do anything to solve this problem. I'm not sure who assigned it to me either so if you want to take over on this Seb, please go ahead.

(0029499) Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator) 2012-10-24 11:06	The white border no longer shows up when a state file is loaded from the UI or Python. Please reopen if the problem persists with the development version of ParaView (and include a state file, if possible).

(0029751) Eelco van Vliet (reporter) 2012-11-20 08:30	Just tried it with pvbatch from version 3.98, but the problem still persists. Are you sure it was fixed ?

(0029752) Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator) 2012-11-20 09:53	Please attach a state file to help reproduce.

(0029781) Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator) 2012-11-23 09:51	reopening since reported reproducible by user. Awaiting state from user.

(0030427) Eelco van Vliet (reporter) 2013-03-14 06:32	I have already uploaded the statefile + image to a new issue 0013668, but I understand you have linked that issue to this one, so I will do it again. Here I have uploaded a new example of the white boxes occuring around text labels and legends in the latest paraview version 3.98 if you make the image with pvbatch. See the image cavity_Ustreamlines_t000005.png I have also uploaded an OpenFOAM icoFoam case (most simple tutorial) which you can run with Allrun (if you have openfoam installed). This tarball also contains the statefile I used to make the image: Ustreamlines.pvsm I must say: I have a special way of passing the statefiles to pvbatch: I use a script I wrote myself called pvbatchprocess.pl and pvbatchprocess.py. The pvbatchprocess.pl reads an external file pvcases.dat (also included) in which you can define cases and states. Then per case and state a call to pvbatchprocess.py is made. In this python script I read the original paraview statefile (in this case Ustreamlines.pvsm) and add labels as defined in the pvcases.dat file. This allows you to batchprocess a whole bunch of cases. The script also replaces the original case file name for a new case file name such that you can use one statefile for multiple cases which are similar. Finally, this script also allows you to loop over a time range of VTK file stored in a directory such as produced by the sampling routines of OpenFOAM. After processing by pvbatchprocess.py, a new statefile is make which I have also included here: pvtemp_t1363255815.824347.pvsm. This new pvtemp state is finally passed to pvbatch. In order to check the bug, you should therefore use this final pvtemp statefile. Sorry for this long explanation which complicate things a bit, but those script make my paraview/openfoam live a lot easier when you want to batch process a lot of similar cases. Hopefully you can fix the bug which produces those white boxes! Regards Eelco

(0033147) Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator) 2014-07-30 13:16	No longer reproducible in git/master. I am quite sure this was fixed a while ago.

(0033166) Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator) 2014-07-31 09:00	SUMMARY --------------------------------------------- Topics merged into master: (VTK) 14599_fix_double_range_issues 14789_fix_border 14831_log_scaling_crash 14848_fix_mutlselection appdata-file catalyst-dependencies catalyst-kits compilation_issue_processxml excess-moc-wrapping fix-cache-doc fix-catalyst-python kit-libraries (VTK) newest-xdmf pass_connectid_to_autompi remove-mpi4py (VTK) update-vtk-20140729 --------------------------------------------- Topics reverted from next: 14813_fix_mode_shapes_range fix_proxy_widget_dialog_apply pvweb-fixes

(0033264) Alan Scott (manager) 2014-08-19 21:53	I believe this is the same as 13668, which was tested and closed. If this is in error, please reopen or send us a new bug report.