[vtk-developers] RE: Should this be an alternate valid image...?

[David Cole]

And doing the same exercise in this case convinces me that my alternate image is certainly no worse than teapotHulls_3 ...

 

Ah, VTKData, how do I love thee? Let me count the ways: “”, _1, _2, _3, _4, ...

 


From: David Cole
Sent: ‎March‎ ‎21‎, ‎2013 ‎7‎:‎06‎ ‎AM
To: David Gobbi
CC: VTK Developers
Subject: RE: [vtk-developers] Should this be an alternate valid image...?



😊


I was leery of it, too, but became less so after looking at all the other existing alternate images for the tests in question.



From: David Gobbi
Sent: ‎March‎ ‎20‎, ‎2013 ‎10‎:‎45‎ ‎PM
To: David Cole
CC: VTK Developers
Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Should this be an alternate valid image...?


If I was there, you would have heard me speak up against that.  And,
yes, I probably would have been overruled.

 - David

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:38 PM, David Cole <dlrdave at aol.com> wrote:
> Yes, but we added alternate images for similar failures on dash-a-thon day last month...
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:49 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Isn't this due to your graphics card ignoring two-sided lighting for
>> wireframes?  If there were several machines failing, then a new
>> baseline would make sense, but if it's one machine with known
>> gfx problems, I think suppression is the best option.
>>
>> - David
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:32 PM, David Cole <dlrdave at aol.com> wrote:
>>> I turned on Qt and python for my VTK dashboard machine and ran an
>>> Experimental earlier today. I got just one test failure from the python
>>> tests:
>>>
>>>    http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=181911042&build=2851369
>>>
>>> The image looks very close to me, and the image error is only in the 20’s...
>>>
>>> Should I add this as an alternate image for this test, or is there something
>>> that needs fixing, or should I suppress this test?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for any advice,
>>> David C.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20130321/7ca3d0ec/attachment.html>