[vtk-developers] Should this be an alternate valid image...?

[David Gobbi]

I'd bet that if the wireframes were generated with vtkExtractEdges
instead of SetRepresentationToWireframe, then only a single baseline
would be needed.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:30 AM, David Cole <dlrdave at aol.com> wrote:
> And doing the same exercise in this case convinces me that my alternate
> image is certainly no worse than teapotHulls_3 ...
>
> Ah, VTKData, how do I love thee? Let me count the ways: “”, _1, _2, _3, _4,
> ...
>
>
> From: David Cole
> Sent: ‎March‎ ‎21‎, ‎2013 ‎7‎:‎06‎ ‎AM
> To: David Gobbi
> CC: VTK Developers
> Subject: RE: [vtk-developers] Should this be an alternate valid image...?
>
> 😊
>
> I was leery of it, too, but became less so after looking at all the other
> existing alternate images for the tests in question.
>
>
> From: David Gobbi
> Sent: ‎March‎ ‎20‎, ‎2013 ‎10‎:‎45‎ ‎PM
> To: David Cole
> CC: VTK Developers
> Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Should this be an alternate valid image...?
>
> If I was there, you would have heard me speak up against that.  And,
> yes, I probably would have been overruled.
>
>  - David
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:38 PM, David Cole <dlrdave at aol.com> wrote:
>> Yes, but we added alternate images for similar failures on dash-a-thon day
>> last month...
>>
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:49 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't this due to your graphics card ignoring two-sided lighting for
>>> wireframes?  If there were several machines failing, then a new
>>> baseline would make sense, but if it's one machine with known
>>> gfx problems, I think suppression is the best option.
>>>
>>> - David
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:32 PM, David Cole <dlrdave at aol.com> wrote:
>>>> I turned on Qt and python for my VTK dashboard machine and ran an
>>>> Experimental earlier today. I got just one test failure from the python
>>>> tests:
>>>>
>>>>    http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=181911042&build=2851369
>>>>
>>>> The image looks very close to me, and the image error is only in the
>>>> 20’s...
>>>>
>>>> Should I add this as an alternate image for this test, or is there
>>>> something
>>>> that needs fixing, or should I suppress this test?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any advice,
>>>> David C.